Despite her getup: She's actually really attractive and well-spoken!
Love also the funny comparison between tobacco spittle being dropped on her hand early in the morning versus after 5pm...
I had a horrible dream last night where some low-key creepy man gave me a supposedly recreational drug that swelled up my face and stomach horribly and caused the edges of the swellings to turn orange.
I haven't been feeling that well recently because I've been smoking too much: 10 years ago, I could wake up after a night of heavy smoking and drinking and have no after-effects---but today, I'm hacking like all of the 50-somethings I used to see/hear hacking years ago. I'm embarrassed for myself to have found myself hacking JUST LIKE THAT. Just a recent thing, maybe started 2 months ago. I'm smoking no more or less than I have been for the past 30 years... Yet all of a sudden, the results are much more obvious and dire, both inwardly and outwardly. Obviously, I've got to stop what I'm doing (said as I suck on the 20th cig of the evening). In the past, it was always reading/hearing "Smoking is not good for you." And the warnings not meaning anything. But recently: Smoking has really been affecting my health---for the first time ever.
Tonight while on the Internet, for instance, I thought about it ahead of time and planned to only smoke one cig per hour... Wound up ignoring that and smoking as I pleased. Knowing that I'll feel like shit in the morning.
That's the dilemma: When you drink and smoke in the evening, you're feeling great---but then there's the morning to face. I understand that fresh-and-clean mornings can have a purifying effect---but then beer/cig-fueled evenings-into-late-nights can also be even more inspirational. Mentally, the booze/cigs win (drinking and smoking is fun). Spiritually, the clear mornings win. Physically, obviously my body is telling me something: Stop doing what you're doing. I can't just yet, but I get it, I get it.
Boo-hoo! In my looks-prime (12 thru 40), I often felt annoyed by male attention---often self-conscious because I was being stared at and thus unable to be myself (much as my cats, when I look at them, will suddenly stop whatever activity they're doing and start cleaning themselves).
In my 20s and 30s, I often longed to be able to just go into a bar where music was playing and sit, anonymously, and enjoy the band. I saw guys doing this, and I wanted to be able to do this, too, so I tried it from about '95 thru '00. It never quite worked out.
Usually the band that I was seeing had some guy singer that I was attracted to. (I wasn't just going out randomly.) So if I went to a place and sat there by myself (which guys can do but girls can't), male patrons of the club would come up to me and sit down and chat, which was OK. But then when the guy I liked from the band would take a break and come over, and I'd be paying more attention to him, the "regular" guys would get pissed off. I wasn't trying to "score" or anything---I did go home with the "guy from the band" exactly twice, but this one particular guy was on heroin and disappeared into his bedroom, leaving me to chat in the living room with his roommate. Or else there was a minor "scene" when the guy, flatteringly to me at the time, DEMANDED that I come over when I was about to go home. At other times, when I followed this guy to his gigs around town, he ignored me or else asked for money (!).
So that was a side-note to my past early life, when a bunch of weirdness usually prevailed.
But my original point: From about age 12 to age 40, I had a bunch of guys constantly looking at me. Which made me uncomfortable at the time, but which I partially miss now, in my 50s, just in small ways.
Today, I drove across town to have an ID made for work. One of the two ID-making guys was VERY good-looking (the other a sniffling hippie-looking guy who went on a search for Kleenex at some point), and, yes, I hoped I'd get the good-looking guy instead of the sickly hippie! I DID get the good-looking guy---but when I commented right before my photo was taken about "How does my hair look?", I got a shock: "Sandy silver---some people would pay for that."
I was making small talk! I mean, his response was "kind" and all, but... It's the kind of thing this good-looking 30-something man would say to his elderly aunt! :) OMG---reminds me of when I was in NYC as a 42-year-old and was in a store buying jeans---the young, friendly sales-girl said something like "I wish my mom looked as good in those jeans!" (And she was trying to be nice, not bitchy---it's just that I was still thinking of myself as a younger person, whereas younger people were/are, inadvertently and honestly, telling me that I was either middle-aged or old!) :)
Who the hell am I to say? It's like basketball player LeBron James making pronouncements. Except James has an uneducated BLM agenda, and I'm educated about history and have no agenda, other than common sense.
If you're a small country on the border of Russia, then stop poking the bear. Yes, I understand that you want US and International money. That's exactly what happened in the Ukraine---Western/US NGO money flooded in (including Biden support for the Burisma energy company), and then all of a sudden, Ukraine was demanding NATO membership. Well, of course, Russia wasn't going to have that from a former territory on its border.
Finland and Sweden: You should probably be aware of your surroundings and history and continue your neutrality. I highly doubt that the US is going to get involved in a war over you. But then again: Look at Sarajevo.
You should also probably take a closer look at your current leaders, selling you out in the long term for immediate tech money.
I just noticed this a couple of months ago:
The Prime Minister of the UK is Rishi Sunak (Indian).
The Prime Minister of Scotland is Humza Yousaf (Pakistani).
The Mayor of London is Sadiq Khan (Pakistani).
What happened to a people that they're no longer ruling themselves? Yes, the British were one-time colonizers of India (now India and Pakistan). Is this revenge? Is this Anglo-Saxon guilt?
While the USA has always been the proverbial "melting pot," the UK has a distinct ethnic history dating back thousands of years. And they're now allowing Indians and Pakistanis to rule them?
Quite bizarre. (Imagine today if a Brit were attempting to run India or Pakistan---I highly doubt that the populace would put up with this. Yes, I understand that the Brits were once colonizers of India---which is why I suspect this current state of affairs in the UK is purely "white guilt." Otherwise, why allow it? No rational country would ever allow it.)
Take your country back. I advise this for any country. UK, India, Pakistan --- Your country should be ruled by your own people. (Oh wait---India and Pakistan ARE currently ruled by their own people.)
Half of the book is on grocery-store brown paper and printed sideways, where you can't read the text near the spine unless you forcibly bend it. (Was this a test of some sort? "Wow---I'm so groovily non-violent that I don't even try to read what Guru tells me because I don't want to hurt a book or the tree that made it...")
Aside from the annoying physical composition of the book, the text itself is from 1971--- What perhaps seemed "enlightened" at that time is a bit dim-witted and obvious now that we've had 50 years to recover from what the media all told us was "profound." Here's a sample:
Lame, halt, blind, dying
We're all dying
At this moment
Your body is disintegrating
Before your very eyes
If you've taken LSD you may be
Seeing it do this but you know
It's happening anyway
It's all a downhill trip all the way
What this reminds me of is very bad poetry that I read when I was a sophomore in a poetry class in college circa 1985. A bad writer trying to explain what he/she was feeling; because of the bad writing, we couldn't feel anything that the writer was feeling.
Same with most of this "Be Here Now" text." "Ram Dass" (aka "Richard Albert," formerly of Harvard) was canonized among hippies in the late '60s/early '70s because he'd once been part of The Establishment and then left it after his collegiate LSD experimentation was verboten. Albert then went on to India and later to write this:
You meet another person & there are
qualities in that personality which of-
fend you & there are qualities which
attract you -- some qualities seduce
you -- some qualities repel you -- ...
REALLY? Sometimes you like your mate and sometimes you don't? No one ever knew this, Ram Dass? How did you figure this out?
In short: This text is of its time, but it's not actually very profound at all. Since 1971, I'm sure most of us on this planet have done drugs and had similar "insights." Maybe "profound" in 1971, but not so much 50 years later after every shallow club kid has been on exactly the same "trip." And what other non-drug-doing person on the planet has ever NOT had the experience of sometimes liking and then disliking their mate?
At the time that this book was released, there was so much left-wing worshiping press surrounding it---which transferred to me buying it last month in the hopes of perhaps discovering something, anything. Did anyone ever stop to think that what Richard Albert was expressing about relationships were things that his own parents and grandparents had already figured out---sans drugs---100s of years earlier?
I'm sick of all of these press-promoted "gurus" through the decades who have nothing to say that most of us haven't already figured out innately.